http://dapmalaysia.org Forward Feedback
Media Conference by Lim Kit Siang at Perak DAP Hqrs in Ipoh on
Saturday, 24th May 2008 at 12 noon:
Shameful for Malaysia to host 54th Commonwealth Parliamentary Conference
on “Expanding the role of Parliament in global society” on August 1 – 10
when the role of Malaysian MPs are being diminished and cannot even move
an amendment to the Motion of Thanks for Royal Address The 54th Commonwealth Parliamentary Conference on “Expanding the role
of Parliament in Global Society” will be held in Kuala Lumpur from
August 1 to 10, 2008 and it should be a matter of pride to Malaysian
Members of Parliament that the country has been given the honour to play
host to the annual conference for the Malaysia spent about RM7 million to host a much smaller parliamentary
conference last year – the 28th Asean Inter-Parliamentary Assembly (AIPA)
in Kuala Lumpur last August involving nine ASEAN nations. The cost for hosting the 54th Conference of the Commonwealth
Parliamentary Association will be many times more than organising the
AIPA Assemby and I will ask in Parliament on Monday how much the
Malaysian taxpayers will have to bear for Malaysia hosting the August
Conference – whether RM20 – RM30 million or even more. Apart from the cost of the CPA Conference in August, another equally
important question is its purpose. This is because it would be shameful for Malaysia to host the 54th
Commonwealth Parliamentary Conference on “Expanding the role of
Parliament in global society” on August 1 – 10 when the role of
Malaysian MPs are being diminished and cannot even move an amendment to
the Motion of Thanks for Royal Address, as happened on Thursday when my
amendment motion to establish a Royal Commission of Inquiry to resolve
the 30-year problem of illegal immigrants in Sabah was disallowed by the
Deputy Speaker, Datuk Ronald Kiandee on the ground of being “irrelevant”
to the motion proper. Can Ronald Kiandee cite another Commonwealth Parliament which
disallows amendments to the equivalent of Motion of Thanks for the Royal
Address on the ground that it is “irrelevant”? In the House of Commons, amendments to the Motion of Thanks to the
Royal Address are routinely allowed every year, which are debated and
then voted on. One such amendment to the Motion of Thanks for the
Queen’s Gracious Speech, which was moved, debated but rejected in the
House of Commons in 2000, proposed an amendment to the original motion
as follows: 'But humbly regret that the Gracious Speech makes no mention
of the decline in police numbers since 1997; note the continuing
failure of many of the Government's measures to combat youth crime
and that the Government remains committed to the early release from
jail of thousands of criminals; deplore the Government's further
attempt to restrict the right to trial by jury and its failure to
put forward any measures to strengthen the rights of victims of
crime, or to make prisons more purposeful, or sentencing more
transparent, or to clear up the chaos in the asylum system; and
further regret the absence of measures to halt the decline of inner
cities and the failure to create a coherent programme of actions
since 1997 to address the conditions that give rise to the growth of
crime in deprived urban areas, notably poorly-maintained housing,
rising homelessness, increasing numbers of empty houses and failing
inner city schools, which have combined with the Government's
commitment to building on green fields to perpetuate migration from
inner cities.' If Ronald Kiandee had presided as House of Commons Speaker, he would
have ruled the amendment as “irrelevant” which would be completely
unthinkable in the British Parliament! In Lok Sabha or Indian Parliament every year, there would be scores
and in some years even over a hundred amendments to the Motion of Thanks
on the President’s Address, and they would all be voted on by the MPs
without anyone being ruled as “irrelevant” by the Speaker of Indian
Parliament. During the 54th Commonwealth Parliamentay Conference in Kuala Lumpur
in early August, another conference on parliamentary practice and
administration is being organised by the Society of Clerks-at-the-Table
– and it would be mortally disgraceful if Malaysia proves to be the only
Parliament in the Commonwealth where amendments to the Motion of Thanks
for the Royal Address is not allowed, making the Malaysian Parliament a
Commonwealth “curiosity” and laughing stock at the 54th Commonwealth
Parliamentary Conference! What is even more shocking is that Ronald Kiandee had violated a very
clear precedent by the longest-serving Speaker in Malaysia, Tun Mohamad
Zahir Ismail, who had allowed me to move an amendment to the Motion of
Thanks for the Royal Address in October 1982. What grounds and authority have Ronald Kiandee as Deputy Speaker to
violate clear parliamentary practices and precedents both in Malaysia
and other Commonwealth Parliaments to disallow my amendment to the
Motion of Thanks in Parliament last Thursday? I have given notice to the Speaker of Parliament, Tan Sri Pandikar
Amin, to review and overrule the wrong and misconceived decision of
Ronald Kiandee in disallowing my amendment motion in Parliament last
Thursday to establish a Royal Commission of Inquiry to resolve the
30-year problem of illegal immigrants in Sabah. If my substantive motion to review and overrule Ronald Kiandee’s
ruling last Thursday is not allowed to be debated before Parliament
adjourns next week, then the Malaysian Parliament would have two reasons
to become a laughing-stock in the 54th Commonwealth Parliamentary
Conference in August, • Where an amendment to the Motion of Thanks for the Royal
Address is not allowed; and If this is the case, then Parliament and Malaysians must decide
whether any useful purpose could be served in Malaysia hosting the 54th
Commonwealth Parliamentary Conference in August. *
Lim
Kit Siang, DAP
Parliamentary leader & MP for Ipoh Timor |
||
|